Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned

Daniel F. Hanley, Gordon R. Bernard, Consuelo H. Wilkins, Harry P. Selker, Jamie P. Dwyer, Jay B. Dean, Daniel K. Benjamin, Sarah E. Dunsmore, Salina P. Waddy, Kenneth L. Wiley, Marisha E. Palm, W. Andrew Mould, Daniel E. Ford, Jeri Burr, Jacqueline Huvane, Karen Lane, Lori Poole, Terri Edwards, Nan Kennedy, Leslie R. Boone, Jasmine Bell, Emily S. Serdoz, Loretta M. Byrne, Paul A. Harris

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clinical settings and taking studies directly to participants. The Trial Innovation Network, established in 2016 by the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science to address critical roadblocks in clinical research and accelerate the translational research process, has consulted on over 400 research study proposals to date. Its recommendations for decentralized approaches have included eConsent, participant-informed study design, remote intervention, study task reminders, socia

Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1017/cts.2023.597
Catalogue ID
BFmoso8xrl-6l53xm
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.