Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Recruitment methods for survey research: Findings from the Mid-South Clinical Data Research Network

William J. Heerman, Natalie Jackson, Christianne L. Roumie, Paul A. Harris, S. Trent Rosenbloom, Jill M. Pulley, Consuelo H. Wilkins, Neely Williams, David Crenshaw, Cardella Leak, Jon Scherdin, Daniel Muñoz, Justin M. Bachmann, Russell L. Rothman, Sunil Kripalani

Contemporary Clinical Trials · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2017 methods paper examines recruitment and retention approaches across the Mid-South Clinical Data Research Network, a multi-site regional clinical research network. The authors compare the effectiveness of different recruitment strategies and identify demographic and operational factors associated with higher enrolment and retention rates. Findings offer empirical guidance for optimising recruitment practices in regional clinical research networks, though generalisability to other geographic or healthcare settings may be limited.

UK applicability

Findings may have limited direct applicability to UK clinical research networks, which operate under different healthcare structures (NHS-integrated research networks) and regulatory environments (HRA, MHRA oversight). However, the methodological approach to evaluating recruitment efficiency could inform UK Clinical Research Network design and site performance monitoring.

Key measures

Recruitment yield and efficiency by strategy; retention rates; demographic characteristics of enrolled versus non-enrolled participants; operational factors (site capacity, staff experience, protocols) associated with enrolment success

Outcomes reported

The study evaluated the effectiveness of various recruitment and retention strategies employed across multiple clinical research sites within a regional network. It identified demographic and operational factors associated with successful enrolment and participant retention in clinical trials.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort / cross-sectional analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.006
Catalogue ID
BFmoso8xrl-afg83s

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.