Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Creating and implementing a COVID-19 recruitment Data Mart

Tara Helmer, Adam Lewis, Mark A. McEver, Francesco Delacqua, Cindy L. Pastern, Nan Kennedy, Terri Edwards, Beverly Woodward, Paul A. Harris

Journal of Biomedical Informatics · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This report describes the development and deployment of the COVID-19 Recruitment Data Mart at Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, an informatics platform designed to rapidly identify eligible research participants for COVID-19 clinical trials. The system combines technological infrastructure with dedicated project management support to facilitate researcher-participant matching against study-specific criteria. Since launch in July 2020, the platform has demonstrated feasibility through four active studies and 1,693 matched participant referrals, suggesting potential scalability for other time-sensitive research recruitment scenarios.

UK applicability

The methodological approach and platform architecture described may be applicable to UK clinical research infrastructure, particularly NHS-based research networks seeking to streamline participant recruitment for acute health crises or time-sensitive studies. However, direct applicability would depend on UK data governance frameworks, NHS trust structures, and existing patient consent registries.

Key measures

Number of studies onboarded (four); total potential participant matches identified (1,693); implementation timeline (launched 20 July 2020)

Outcomes reported

The study reports on the implementation and initial performance of the COVID-19 Recruitment Data Mart platform, which matched 1,693 potential study participants to four onboarded COVID-19 research studies. The platform identified eligible candidates from a pool of patients who had consented to direct contact for COVID-19 research and matched them against study-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103765
Catalogue ID
BFmoso8xrl-jek5fq

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.