Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 2 — RCT / large cohortPeer-reviewed

Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality

Richard M. Martin, Jenny Donovan, Emma L. Turner, Chris Metcalfe, Grace Young, Eleanor Walsh, J. Athene Lane, Sian Noble, Steven Oliver, Simon Evans, Jonathan A C Sterne, Peter Holding, Yoav Ben‐Shlomo, Peter Brindle, Naomi Williams, Elizabeth Hill, Siaw Yein Ng, Jessica Toole, Marta Tazewell, Laura J. Hughes, Charlotte Davies, Joanna Thorn, Liz Down, George Davey Smith, David E. Neal, Freddie C. Hamdy, CAP Trial Group

JAMA · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This large UK cluster randomised trial of 415,357 men aged 50–69 found that a single PSA screening intervention with standardised diagnostic pathway did not significantly reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality over 10 years compared with standard practice. Whilst 40% of the intervention group attended screening and 36% underwent PSA testing, the rate of prostate cancer death was nearly identical between groups (0.30 vs 0.31 per 1000 person-years; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85–1.08), suggesting that one-off PSA screening offers minimal mortality benefit despite detecting cancers at earlier stages in some men.

UK applicability

These findings are directly applicable to UK prostate cancer screening policy and primary care practice, having been conducted across 573 UK practices. The results inform ongoing debates within the NHS regarding opportunistic PSA screening, suggesting that single-episode screening invitations do not justify widespread implementation as a mortality reduction strategy.

Key measures

Prostate cancer-specific mortality (per 1000 person-years); rate ratio and rate difference; diagnostic stage and Gleason grade of detected cancers; PSA test uptake and biopsy rates; all-cause mortality

Outcomes reported

The study measured prostate cancer-specific mortality at median 10-year follow-up, comparing men invited to PSA screening versus standard unscreened practice. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic cancer stage, Gleason grade, all-cause mortality, and causal effects of screening attendance.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Cluster randomised controlled trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1001/jama.2018.0154
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mfu8-6kawi4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.