Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Research meetings must be more sustainable

Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Roberta Alessandrini, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marco Springmann, Eduardo Aguilera, Barbara Amon, Fabio Bartolini, Markus Geupel, Bruna Grizzetti, Susanna Kugelberg, Catharina Latka, Liang Xia, Anna Birgitte Milford, Patrick Musinguzi, Ee Ling Ng, Helen Suter, Adrian Leip

Nature Food · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This commentary, published in Nature Food in 2020, appears to address the sustainability implications of how the research community organises and conducts meetings, particularly within food systems science. Given the authorship (a diverse international consortium of food systems researchers) and venue, the piece likely argues that research meetings themselves should model sustainable practices aligned with the food system transitions they study. The specific recommendations or evidence base remain uncertain without the abstract.

UK applicability

The paper's argument for sustainable research practice would be relevant to UK-based institutions and funding bodies (UKRI, BBSRC, etc.) seeking to reduce the environmental footprint of research dissemination, particularly for academics studying agricultural sustainability and food systems.

Key measures

As suggested by the title, likely environmental impacts (carbon footprint, travel emissions, resource use) associated with in-person research meetings.

Outcomes reported

The paper likely discusses the environmental footprint of research conferences and meetings within the food and agriculture sector, and proposes or advocates for more sustainable practices in how researchers convene and disseminate findings.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1038/s43016-020-0065-2
Catalogue ID
BFmou2mlz8-5702wb

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.