Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty

David M. Lawrence, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles D. Koven, Keith W. Oleson, Sean Swenson, Gordon B. Bonan, Nathan Collier, Bardan Ghimire, Leo van Kampenhout, Daniel Kennedy, Erik Kluzek, Peter Lawrence, Fang Li, Hong‐Yi Li, Danica Lombardozzi, W. J. Riley, William J. Sacks, Mingjie Shi, Mariana Vertenstein, William R. Wieder, Chonggang Xu, Ashehad A. Ali, Andrew M. Badger, Gautam Bisht, M. R. van den Broeke, Michael A. Brunke, Sean P. Burns, Jonathan Buzan, Martyn Clark, Anthony P Craig, Kyla M. Dahlin, Beth Drewniak, Joshua B. Fisher, M. Flanner, A. M. Fox, Pierre Gentine, Forrest M. Hoffman, G. Keppel‐Aleks, Ryan Knox, Sanjiv Kumar, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, L. Ruby Leung, William H. Lipscomb, Yaqiong Lü, Ashutosh Pandey, Jon D. Pelletier, J. Perket, James T. Randerson, Daniel Ricciuto, Benjamin M. Sanderson, A. G. Slater, Z. M. Subin, Jinyun Tang, R. Quinn Thomas, Maria Val Martin, Xubin Zeng

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper presents Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5), the default land component of CESM2, detailing eight major categories of new or updated processes including hydrology, snow, plant hydraulics, nitrogen cycling, and a global crop model with six crop types. The authors conduct comprehensive benchmarking across an ensemble of simulations and forcing datasets, concluding that multivariate metrics indicate general broad improvement from CLM4 to CLM5, though this assessment is complicated by forcing and parametric uncertainty. CLM5 introduces several novel features including dynamic vegetation modelling options, ozone damage representation, and fire trace gas emissions coupling.

UK applicability

As a global land surface model used in Earth system modelling, CLM5 improvements may indirectly enhance climate and agricultural projections relevant to UK conditions, particularly through better representation of crop processes and nitrogen cycling. However, the abstract does not specifically validate CLM5 performance for UK-specific soils, crops, or climate regimes, so direct applicability to UK farming or policy requires separate regional assessment.

Key measures

International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMBv2) package metrics across multiple variables; ensemble simulations with prescribed and prognostic vegetation states; comparisons between CLM4, CLM4.5, and CLM5 versions

Outcomes reported

The study describes new processes and parameterizations in CLM5 including dynamic land units, updated hydrology and snow physics, plant hydraulics, nitrogen cycling, global crop model, and stomatal physiology. Multivariate benchmarking metrics suggest broad improvement from CLM4 to CLM5, though forcing and parametric uncertainty complicate definitive assessment of individual variables.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Model development and benchmarking study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.1029/2018ms001583
Catalogue ID
BFmovi2a5j-4igwzs

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.