Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Early Archean biogeochemical iron cycling and nutrient availability: New insights from a 3.5 Ga land-sea transition

Clark M. Johnson, Xin‐Yuan Zheng, Tara Djokic, Martin J. Van Kranendonk, Andrew D. Czaja, Eric Roden, Brian L. Beard

Earth-Science Reviews · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Earth-Science Reviews paper synthesises evidence for biogeochemical iron cycling in the early Archean epoch, drawing on geochemical data from a 3.5 Ga land-sea transition. The work suggests that iron availability and cycling processes differed markedly from modern systems, with implications for understanding the constraints on early life and planetary habitability. As a palaeogeochemical study, it contributes to fundamental understanding of nutrient cycling on the early Earth rather than directly informing contemporary farming or food systems.

UK applicability

This is a fundamental palaeoscience study with no direct application to UK farming, soil health, or food production systems. It may indirectly inform long-term perspectives on elemental cycling and nutrient dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems, but such application is highly speculative.

Key measures

Iron oxidation states, isotopic composition, mineralogical assemblages, and inferred nutrient availability in Archean sediments

Outcomes reported

The study examined biogeochemical iron cycling and nutrient availability during the early Archean eon (~3.5 billion years ago) using geological and geochemical analysis of a land-sea transition zone. It inferred constraints on the early Earth's biogeochemistry and nutrient cycling processes.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103992
Catalogue ID
BFmovi2ass-ss1qqe

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.