Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Molecular diagnosis of the tick-borne pathogen Anaplasma marginale in cattle blood samples from Nigeria using qPCR

Nusirat Elelu, Joana Ferrolho, Joana Couto, Ana Domingos, Mark C. Eisler

Experimental and Applied Acarology · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2016 study describes the molecular diagnosis of Anaplasma marginale, a tick-borne pathogen of cattle, using quantitative PCR methodology applied to blood samples from Nigeria. The work contributes to understanding the presence and distribution of this economically important disease in West African cattle populations. As suggested by the journal focus and authorship, the study appears to establish or validate qPCR protocols for field-based pathogen detection in resource-limited settings.

UK applicability

Anaplasma marginale is not endemic to the United Kingdom; this diagnostic work is of limited direct applicability to UK cattle health. However, the qPCR methodology and diagnostic validation approach may inform tick-borne disease surveillance protocols if similar pathogens become a concern through climate change or international trade in livestock.

Key measures

qPCR detection of Anaplasma marginale DNA; prevalence of infection in Nigerian cattle blood samples

Outcomes reported

The study developed and applied quantitative PCR (qPCR) methodology to detect and diagnose Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle blood samples collected from Nigeria. Detection rates and molecular characterisation of the tick-borne pathogen in the sampled population are reported.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Animal health & welfare
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Nigeria
System type
Pasture-based livestock
DOI
10.1007/s10493-016-0081-y
Catalogue ID
BFmowc22d1-pcm6tl

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.