Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield

Giovanni Tamburini, Riccardo Bommarco, Thomas Cherico Wanger, Claire Kremen, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden, Matt Liebman, Sara Hallin

Science Advances · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This second-order meta-analysis of 5,160 original studies demonstrates that agricultural diversification practices enhance multiple ecosystem services—including pollination, pest control, nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and water regulation—without reducing crop yields. The analysis distinguished between practices targeting aboveground biodiversity (which improved pest control and water regulation) and those targeting belowground biodiversity (though the abstract text is incomplete regarding their specific benefits). The findings suggest diversification can reduce agronomic input dependency whilst maintaining productive capacity.

Regional applicability

The international scope of this synthesis suggests findings are likely applicable to United Kingdom cropping and mixed farming systems, particularly regarding pest control and soil fertility enhancement through diversification. UK producers seeking to improve resilience and ecosystem services within existing yield constraints may find the meta-analytical evidence directly relevant to decision-making.

Key measures

Biodiversity indices, pollination rates, pest control effectiveness, nutrient cycling, soil fertility metrics, water regulation, crop yield

Outcomes reported

This second-order meta-analysis synthesised 98 meta-analyses comprising 5,160 original studies to assess the impact of diversification practices on above- and belowground biodiversity, ecosystem services, and crop yields. The study quantified effects across multiple ecosystem services including pollination, pest control, nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and water regulation.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Regenerative & agroecological farming
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.aba1715
Catalogue ID
BFmowc2dp6-94ihf5

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.