Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Optimal Design of an Added-Sugar Menu Warning Label: A Randomized Experiment

Lemmon B, Gil A, Musicus AA, Hall MG, Roberto CA, Falbe J. Optimal design of an added-sugar menu warning label: a randomized experiment

Am J Prev Med · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Referenced by Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT as citation 32; likely supports topic area: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics. Topics: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics Evidence type: Trial / experiment Source report: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT Ref#: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT #32 Original: Lemmon B, Gil A, Musicus AA, Hall MG, Roberto CA, Falbe J. Optimal design of an added-sugar menu warning label: a randomized experiment. Am J Prev Med 2025; 69: 108038.

Outcomes reported

Referenced by Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT as citation 32; likely supports topic area: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics. Topics: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics Evidence type: Trial / experiment Source report: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT Ref#: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT #32 Original: Lemmon B, Gil A, Musicus AA, Hall MG, Roberto CA, Falbe J. Optimal design of an added-sugar menu warning label: a randomized experiment. Am J Prev Med 2025; 69: 108038.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Food environments & consumer behaviour
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed research
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108038
Catalogue ID
IRmoq83nfm-3cd5d6
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.