Summary
Referenced by Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT as citation 32; likely supports topic area: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics. Topics: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics Evidence type: Trial / experiment Source report: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT Ref#: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT #32 Original: Lemmon B, Gil A, Musicus AA, Hall MG, Roberto CA, Falbe J. Optimal design of an added-sugar menu warning label: a randomized experiment. Am J Prev Med 2025; 69: 108038.
Outcomes reported
Referenced by Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT as citation 32; likely supports topic area: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics. Topics: front-of-package labelling / warning labels; methods / modelling / statistics Evidence type: Trial / experiment Source report: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT Ref#: Lancet Public Health FOPL RCT #32 Original: Lemmon B, Gil A, Musicus AA, Hall MG, Roberto CA, Falbe J. Optimal design of an added-sugar menu warning label: a randomized experiment. Am J Prev Med 2025; 69: 108038.
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.