Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

blme: Bayesian Linear Mixed-Effects Models

Dorie V [0000-0002-9576-3064]

CRAN: Contributed Packages · 2011

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Maximum a posteriori estimation for linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models in a Bayesian setting, implementing the methods of Chung, et al. (2013) &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11336-013-9328-2" target="_top">doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9328-2</a>&gt;. Extends package 'lme4' (Bates, Maechler, Bolker, and Walker (2015) &lt;<a href="https://doi.org/10.18637%2Fjss.v067.i01" target="_top">doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01</a>&gt;).

Outcomes reported

Referenced by Nature Communications British biodiversity scenarios as citation 91; likely supports topic area: methods / modelling / statistics. Topics: methods / modelling / statistics Evidence type: Modelling / projection Source report: Nature Communications British biodiversity scenarios Ref#: Nature Communications British biodiversity scenarios #91 Original: Dorie, V. blme: Bayesian Linear Mixed-Effects Models (Version 1.0- 5) https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/blme/index.html (2021).

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed research
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Other
DOI
10.32614/cran.package.blme
Catalogue ID
IRmoq83nfm-d753af
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.