Summary
Abstract The Anthropocene is characterized by a rapid pace of environmental change and is causing a multitude of biotic responses, including those that affect the spatial distribution of species. Lagged responses are frequent and species distributions and assemblages are consequently pushed into a disequilibrium state. How the characteristics of environmental change—for example, gradual ‘press’ disturbances such as rising temperatures due to climate change versus infrequent ‘pulse’ disturbances such as extreme events—affect the magnitude of responses and the relaxation times of biota has been insufficiently explored. It is also not well understood how widely used approaches to assess or project the responses of species to changing environmental conditions can deal with time lags. It, therefore, remains unclear to what extent time lags in species distributions are accounted for in biodiversity assessments, scenarios and models; this has ramifications for policymaking and conservation science alike. This perspective piece reflects on lagged species responses to environmental change and discusses the potential consequences for species distribution models (SDMs), the tools of choice in biodiversity modelling. We suggest ways to better account for time lags in calibrating these models and to reduce their leverage effects in projections for improved biodiversity science and policy.
Outcomes reported
Referenced by Nature Communications British biodiversity scenarios as citation 70; likely supports topic area: biodiversity / conservation; methods / modelling / statistics. Topics: biodiversity / conservation; methods / modelling / statistics Evidence type: Modelling / projection Source report: Nature Communications British biodiversity scenarios Ref#: Nature Communications British biodiversity scenarios #70 Original: Essl, F. et al. Potential sources of time lags in calibrating species distribution models. J. Biogeogr. 51, 89-102 (2024).
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.