Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Women Consumers’ Views on Legislation to Restrict Prominent Placement and Multibuy Promotions of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt Products in England: A Qualitative Perspective

Dhuria P [0000-0003-2803-4424]; Muir S [0000-0001-7444-7321]; Lawrence W [0000-0003-1264-0438]; Roe E [0000-0003-4674-2133]; Crozier S [0000-0002-9524-1127]; Cooper C [0000-0003-3510-0709]; Baird J [0000-0002-4039-4361]; Vogel C [0000-0002-3897-3786]

International Journal of Health Policy and Management · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Background: As part of the childhood obesity strategy, the UK Government has introduced regulations to restrict the ways high fat salt and sugar (HFSS) products can be promoted in retail settings from October 2022. This study explored (i) consumers’ views on the likely impact of the UK legislation restricting the placement and promotion of HFSS products on their shopping behaviours and (ii) consumers’ beliefs about who is responsible for healthy eating. Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who shopped at a discount supermarket. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes. Results: Participants’ (n = 34) had a median age of 35 years and over half were in paid employment. Five themes were identified: (1) The legislation is acceptable, but people can still (and should be able to) buy HFSS items; (2) The legislation is likely to have more impact on shoppers who do not plan their shopping; (3) Affordability of healthy food is just as, or more, important than the legislation; (4) It’s up to the individual to eat healthily; and (5) Government and retailers can better support consumers to make healthy choices. Conclusion: Most participants were optimistic about the incoming regulations and believed that it would support consumers to make healthier food choices. Many raised concerns, however, that the high price of healthy foods and continued availability of unhealthy foods within the stores could undermine the legislation’s benefits. Coupling the legislation with interventions to promote and reduce the costs of healthier products would go some way to ensure its success. Raising awareness about marketing strategies that play into consumer concerns for cost and autonomy could further increase acceptance of the policy.

Outcomes reported

Referenced by PLOS supermarket placement trial as citation 64; likely supports topic area: supermarket placement / food retail environment; obesity / chronic disease / public health. Topics: obesity / chronic disease / public health; supermarket placement / food retail environment Evidence type: Policy / guidance Source report: PLOS supermarket placement trial Ref#: PLOS supermarket placement trial #64 Original: Dhuria P, Muir S, Lawrence W, Roe E, Crozier S, Cooper C, et al. Women consumers’ views on legislation to restrict prominent placement and multibuy promotions of high fat, sugar, and salt products in England: a qualitative perspective. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7597. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597 PMID: 38618804

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Food environments & consumer behaviour
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed research
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Other
DOI
10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597
Catalogue ID
IRmoq83umn-341326
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.