Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design

Vogel C [0000-0002-3897-3786]; Crozier S; Dhuria P; Shand C; Lawrence W; Cade J; Moon G; Lord J; Ball K; Cooper C; Baird J

BMJ Open · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Introduction Poor diet is a leading risk factor for non-communicable diseases and costs the National Health Service £5.8 billion annually. Product placement strategies used extensively in food outlets, like supermarkets, can influence customers’ preferences. Policy-makers, including the UK Government, are considering legislation to ensure placement strategies promote healthier food purchasing and dietary habits. High-quality scientific evidence is needed to inform future policy action. This study will assess whether healthier placement strategies in supermarkets improve household purchasing patterns and the diets of more than one household member. Methods and analyses This natural experiment, with a prospective matched controlled cluster design, is set in discount supermarkets across England. The primary objective is to investigate whether enhanced placement of fresh fruit and vegetables improves household-level purchasing of these products after 6 months. Secondary objectives will examine: (1) differences in intervention effects on purchasing by level of educational attainment, (2) intervention effects on the dietary quality of women and their young children, (3) intervention effects on store-level sales of fruit and vegetables and (4) cost-effectiveness of the intervention from individual, retailer and societal perspectives. Up to 810 intervention and 810 control participants will be recruited from 18 intervention and 18 matched control stores. Eligible participants will be women aged 18–45 years, who hold a loyalty card and shop in a study store. Each control store will be matched to an intervention store on: (1) sales profile, (2) neighbourhood deprivation and (3) customer profile. A detailed process evaluation will assess intervention implementation, mechanisms of impact and, social and environmental contexts. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ID 20986.A5). Primary, secondary and process evaluation results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and shared with policy-makers. Trial registration number NCT03573973 .

Outcomes reported

Referenced by PLOS supermarket placement trial as citation 21; likely supports topic area: supermarket placement / food retail environment; diet quality / nutrition / dietary guidelines. Topics: diet quality / nutrition / dietary guidelines; supermarket placement / food retail environment Evidence type: Trial / experiment Source report: PLOS supermarket placement trial Ref#: PLOS supermarket placement trial #21 Original: Vogel C, Crozier S, Dhuria P, Shand C, Lawrence W, Cade J, et al. Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e036758. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758 PMID: 32047023

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Fruit & vegetables
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed research
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Other
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758
Catalogue ID
IRmoq83umn-d4f7d3
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.