Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes

Shaw SC [0000-0002-2206-6858]; Ntani G [0000-0001-7481-6860]; Baird J [0000-0002-4039-4361]; Vogel CA [0000-0002-3897-3786]

Nutrition Reviews · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Abstract Context Product placement strategies have been used to influence customers’ food purchases in food stores for some time; however, assessment of the evidence that these techniques can limit unhealthy, and promote healthy, food choices has not been completed. Objective This systematic review aimed to determine how product placement strategies, availability, and positioning, in physical retail food stores located in high-income countries, influence dietary-related behaviors. Data Sources From a search of 9 databases, 38 articles, 17 observational studies, and 22 intervention studies met the study inclusion criteria. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently extracted data relating to study design, study population, exposures, outcomes, and key results. Each study was also assessed for risk of bias in relation to the research question. Data Analysis Meta-analysis was not possible owing to heterogeneous study designs and outcomes. As recommended by Cochrane, results were synthesized in effect direction plots using a vote-counting technique which recorded the direction of effect and significance level according to the expected relationship for health improvement. Conclusions The majority of studies showed that greater availability and more prominent positioning of healthy foods, or reduced availability and less prominent positioning of unhealthy foods, related to better dietary-related behaviors. A large number of results, however, were nonsignificant, which likely reflects the methodological difficulties inherent in this research field. Adequately powered intervention studies that test both the independent and additive effects of availability and positioning strategies are needed. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. 42016048826

Outcomes reported

Referenced by PLOS supermarket placement trial as citation 11; likely supports topic area: supermarket placement / food retail environment; diet quality / nutrition / dietary guidelines. | Referenced by PLOS supermarket placement trial as citation 20; likely supports topic area: supermarket placement / food retail environment; diet quality / nutrition / dietary guidelines. Topics: diet quality / nutrition / dietary guidelines; supermarket placement / food retail environment Evidence type: Review / synthesis Source report: PLOS supermarket placement trial Ref#: PLOS supermarket placement trial #11; PLOS supermarket placement trial #20 Original: Shaw SC, Ntani G, Baird J, Vogel CA. A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes. Nutr Rev. 2020;78(12):1030-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa024 PMID: 32483615

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Food environments & consumer behaviour
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed research
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Other
DOI
10.1093/nutrit/nuaa024
Catalogue ID
IRmoq83umn-ea83be
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.