Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Nanoparticles for Sustainable Agriculture: Assessment of Benefits and Risks

Mohammed Bouhadi; Qaiser Javed; Monika Jakubus; Mhammed El Kouali; Hassan Fougrach; Ayesha Ansar; Smiljana Goreta Ban; Dean Ban; David Heath; M. Černe

Agronomy · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This review examines the emerging role of engineered nanoparticles as inputs in sustainable agriculture, drawing on the international literature to weigh documented agronomic benefits — including enhanced nutrient delivery, pest and disease suppression, and improved stress resilience — against potential risks to soil ecosystems, non-target organisms, and human health. The multi-author, internationally affiliated team suggests a comparative, cross-contextual scope, likely incorporating evidence from controlled experiments and field studies across diverse cropping systems. The paper appears to conclude with a framework or set of recommendations for risk-proportionate deployment of nanotechnology in agricultural practice.

UK applicability

Whilst the review is international in scope, its findings are broadly relevant to UK agriculture, particularly given increasing interest in precision nutrient delivery and reduced agrochemical inputs under the UK's post-Brexit Environmental Land Management schemes; however, UK and EU regulatory frameworks governing nanomaterial use in food and agriculture would require careful consideration before any practical adoption.

Key measures

Crop yield response; nutrient use efficiency; phytotoxicity thresholds; soil microbial community effects; nanoparticle size and concentration parameters; risk-benefit indices

Outcomes reported

The study likely assessed the efficacy of various nanoparticles (e.g. zinc, copper, titanium dioxide, carbon-based) in improving crop growth, nutrient use efficiency, and stress tolerance, whilst evaluating associated ecotoxicological and human health risks. It probably synthesised evidence on dose-response relationships, soil accumulation, and regulatory considerations for nanomaterial use in agricultural contexts.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Agricultural inputs & emerging technologies
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.3390/agronomy15051131
Catalogue ID
NRmo3f02hq-03e

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.