Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapies in Cancer: Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Limitations

Judith A. Seidel, Atsushi Otsuka, Kenji Kabashima

Frontiers in Oncology · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review synthesises current evidence on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor antibodies, which have demonstrated dramatic improvements in disease outcomes for melanoma patients and are now clinically approved internationally. The authors examine the immunological mechanisms underlying these therapies, their demonstrated efficacy, and critically assess their limitations, noting that the majority of advanced-stage melanoma patients do not respond or experience relapse. The review further explores emerging strategies to overcome resistance and extend the therapeutic utility of checkpoint inhibitors beyond melanoma to other cancer types.

UK applicability

These findings are relevant to UK oncology practice, as checkpoint inhibitors are approved and used within the NHS for melanoma and other cancers. The review's analysis of mechanism, efficacy and limitations would inform UK clinical decision-making and policy on immunotherapy provision, though the paper does not address UK-specific healthcare or commissioning contexts.

Key measures

Mechanisms of action of checkpoint inhibitors; clinical efficacy and disease outcomes; response rates and relapse patterns in advanced melanoma; limitations and resistance to therapy

Outcomes reported

The review examined the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and limitations of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor antibodies in melanoma and other cancers. It explored clinical outcomes, resistance patterns, and future therapeutic avenues for these immunotherapies.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2018.00086
Catalogue ID
SNmoh0dwem-o4146g

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.