Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Mitigating head motion artifact in functional connectivity MRI

Rastko Ćirić, Adon F.G. Rosen, Güray Erus, Matthew Cieslak, Azeez Adebimpe, Philip A. Cook, Danielle S. Bassett, Christos Davatzikos, Daniel H. Wolf, Theodore D. Satterthwaite

Nature Protocols · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Nature Protocols publication describes a standardised protocol for identifying and correcting head motion artefacts in resting-state fMRI studies. As suggested by the title and venue, the work addresses a significant source of noise in functional connectivity measurements that can bias results if not properly controlled. The protocol appears to provide practical guidance for neuroimaging researchers seeking to improve data quality and reproducibility.

UK applicability

The methodological approach is applicable to UK neuroimaging centres and research institutions conducting fMRI studies, as motion artefact correction is a universal technical requirement regardless of geography. Adoption of standardised correction protocols would improve consistency with international research standards.

Key measures

Head motion parameters, functional connectivity metrics, signal-to-noise ratio, artefact detection algorithms

Outcomes reported

The study presents methods for detecting and mitigating head motion artefacts in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to improve the reliability of functional connectivity analysis. The protocol addresses a common technical challenge that confounds neuroimaging results when participants move during scanning.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Guideline
Study design
Methodological protocol
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1038/s41596-018-0065-y
Catalogue ID
SNmohdwb0n-drg79b

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.