Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0

Nathalie Percie du Sert, Amrita Ahluwalia, Sabina Alam, Marc T. Avey, Monya Baker, William J. Browne, Alejandra Clark, Innes C. Cuthill, Ulrich Dirnagl, Michael Emerson, Paul Garner, Stephen T. Holgate, David W. Howells, Viki Hurst, Natasha A. Karp, Stanley E. Lazic, Katie Lidster, Catriona MacCallum, Malcolm Macleod, Esther J. Pearl, Ole H. Petersen, Frances Rawle, Penny S. Reynolds, Kieron Rooney, Emily S. Sena, Shai D. Silberberg, Thomas Steckler, Hanno Würbel

PLoS Biology · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper presents the revised ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines, an updated framework for transparent reporting of in vivo animal experiments developed to improve reproducibility in biomedical research. The accompanying explanation and elaboration document provides detailed rationale, evidence, and practical examples for each of the 21 reporting items, alongside guidance on study design and conduct best practice. Though the original ARRIVE guidelines (2010) achieved widespread endorsement, adoption impact on publication transparency remained limited; the 2.0 revision aims to address this through enhanced usability and implementation support.

UK applicability

These guidelines are relevant to UK researchers conducting or publishing animal research across all academic institutions and journals. Adoption by UK funding bodies (such as UKRI) and journals would improve the reproducibility and transparency of biomedical research conducted in the United Kingdom.

Key measures

Reporting completeness and transparency across 21 standardised items covering study design, conduct, analysis, and publication aspects of animal research

Outcomes reported

The paper presents revised ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines with 21 items designed to improve transparent reporting of in vivo animal experiments. It provides elaboration, rationale, and examples of good reporting practice for each guideline item.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Guideline
Study design
Guideline
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411
Catalogue ID
SNmohdwel6-i3e6mt

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.