Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Sentinel node navigation surgery in cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosuke Yoshihara, Masahiro Kagabu, Satoru Nagase, Hidetaka Katabuchi, Mikio Mikami, Tsutomu Tabata, Yasuyuki Hirashima, Yoichi Kobayashi, Masanori Kaneuchi, Hideki Tokunaga, Tsukasa Baba

International Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates sentinel lymph node navigation surgery as an alternative to standard pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer staging. The review synthesises diagnostic accuracy data and clinical outcomes to determine whether SLN-directed surgery can reduce surgical morbidity whilst preserving oncological safety. The findings inform whether this less invasive staging approach is suitable for routine cervical cancer management.

UK applicability

Findings are applicable to UK oncology practice where cervical cancer staging and surgical approaches follow international evidence-based guidelines. Adoption of SLN navigation surgery in UK centres would depend on availability of specialist training, imaging technology, and alignment with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cervical cancer management.

Key measures

Sensitivity and specificity of SLN biopsy for detecting lymph node metastases; rates of postoperative complications and morbidity; oncological outcomes including recurrence and survival rates (as suggested by title and journal scope).

Outcomes reported

The study synthesised evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery compared with standard pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. It assessed whether SLN-directed surgery reduces postoperative morbidity whilst maintaining oncological safety and staging efficacy.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Study design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1007/s10147-022-02178-w
Catalogue ID
SNmoht1uqv-arpb2a

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.