Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

From target discovery to clinical drug development with human genetics

Katerina Trajanoska, Claude Bhérer, Daniel Taliun, Sirui Zhou, J. Brent Richards, Vincent Mooser

Nature · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Nature paper, authored by leading genetic epidemiologists, reviews the role of human genetics in drug target discovery and clinical development. The authors examine how genetic approaches—including genome-wide association studies and functional validation—can identify and prioritise therapeutic targets with stronger evidence of human relevance. As suggested by the title and journal scope, the paper likely argues that genetics-informed target selection improves clinical success rates and accelerates translation from discovery to approved therapeutics.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK clinical research and pharmaceutical development policy, particularly for NHS precision medicine initiatives and UK Biobank-linked research. The methodology described may inform how UK regulatory bodies evaluate genetic evidence in licensing decisions.

Key measures

Genetic evidence strength, target validation pathways, clinical trial outcomes, drug development timelines

Outcomes reported

The study examined the application of human genetic approaches to identify and validate drug targets for clinical development. The work synthesised evidence on how genetic discovery platforms can bridge target identification and therapeutic translation.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1038/s41586-023-06388-8
Catalogue ID
SNmoixo3fu-jqbrkz

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.