Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Invasive vs. conservative management of older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: individual patient data meta-analysis

Christos P. Kotanidis, Gregory Mills, Bjørn Bendz, Erlend Sturle Berg, David Hildick‐Smith, Geir Hirlekar, Dejan Milašinović, Nuccia Morici, Aung Myat, Nicolai Tegn, Juan Sanchís, Stefano Savonitto, Stefano De Servi, Keith A.A. Fox, Stuart Pocock, Vijay Kunadian

European Heart Journal · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) are less likely to receive guideline-recommended care including coronary angiography and revascularization. Evidence-based recommendations regarding interventional management strategies in this patient cohort are scarce. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of routine invasive vs. conservative management of NSTEACS by using individual patient data (IPD) from all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched between 1 January 2010 and 11 September 2023. RCTs investigating routine invasive and conservative strategies in persons >70 years old with NSTEACS were included. Observational studies or trials involving

Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Other
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehae151
Catalogue ID
SNmoj1ystw-ohk04t
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.