Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

IMI – Myopia Control Reports Overview and Introduction

James S. Wolffsohn, Daniel Ian Flitcroft, Kate Gifford, Monica Jong, Lyndon Jones, Caroline C. W. Klaver, Nicola S. Logan, Kovin Naidoo, Serge Resnikoff, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Earl Smith, David Troilo, Christine F. Wildsoet

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This International Myopia Institute consensus report synthesises evidence from over 85 multidisciplinary experts on myopia control strategies in response to epidemic-level prevalence in some countries. The work critically reviews animal models, genetic studies, and clinical trial evidence to establish definitions, classify disease, identify risk factors for onset and progression, and provide ethical guidance on intervention application. Seven themed reports form the basis for clinical management recommendations and research standards in the field.

UK applicability

The findings are applicable to UK clinical practice and eye care policy, particularly given rising myopia prevalence in British children. The report's guidance on intervention validation and ethical application would inform UK optometric and ophthalmological standards and public health approaches to myopia management.

Key measures

Myopia prevalence, onset and progression rates, effectiveness of control interventions, clinical trial methodologies, genetic risk factors

Outcomes reported

The report synthesises evidence from animal models, genetics, clinical studies, and randomised controlled trials on myopia control interventions. It provides critical review and recommendations across seven key areas: definition and classification of myopia, experimental models, genetics, interventions, clinical trial design, industry guidelines, and management practices.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review and evidence synthesis with expert consensus
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1167/iovs.18-25980
Catalogue ID
SNmojad09m-wl1os0

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.