Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Cardiac Surgery in Women in the Current Era: What Are the Gaps in Care?

Leslie Cho, Melina R. Kibbe, Faisal G. Bakaeen, Niti R. Aggarwal, Melinda B. Davis, Tara Karmalou, Jennifer S. Lawton, Maral Ouzounian, Ourania Preventza, Andrea M. Russo, A. Laurie Shroyer, Brittany A. Zwischenberger, Kathryn J. Lindley

Circulation · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review synthesises current evidence on cardiovascular surgery outcomes for women in the United States and globally, documenting persistent sex disparities in morbidity, mortality, and surgical referral. The authors examine whether historical inequities in research, clinical practice, and outcomes remain evident, and propose strategies to address identified gaps. The review gives particular attention to the emerging clinical challenge of managing pregnant women with cardiovascular disease requiring surgical intervention.

UK applicability

Whilst this review focuses on United States data and healthcare systems, the underlying clinical pathophysiology of sex differences in cardiovascular disease and surgical outcomes is likely applicable to UK populations. However, UK-specific data on cardiac surgery disparities and referral patterns would be needed to assess whether the identified gaps and proposed solutions directly translate to NHS practice.

Key measures

Morbidity and mortality rates after cardiac surgery in women; sex disparities in research inclusion and surgical referral; postoperative complications and survival outcomes; cardiovascular disease prevalence in women (1 in 3 deaths; 45% of women >20 years with CVD)

Outcomes reported

The review examined sex-related disparities in cardiovascular surgery outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and surgical referral patterns for women, including pregnant women with cardiovascular disease.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.121.056025
Catalogue ID
SNmojbilmx-7jx4vk

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.