Summary
This narrative review synthesises two decades of evidence on minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), documenting how technological innovation and improved surgical techniques have established MICS as a viable alternative to conventional open cardiac surgery with comparable safety and efficacy profiles. The authors examine the current landscape of MICS, identify key advantages and limitations of the approach, and map emerging trends and pathways for further procedural expansion. The paper underscores the critical role of continued technological development in advancing minimally invasive cardiac practice.
UK applicability
This review is relevant to UK cardiac surgery practice and NHS innovation strategy, as adoption of minimally invasive techniques could inform service delivery models and surgeon training requirements. However, applicability depends on UK-specific data on resource availability, training capacity, and patient outcomes within the NHS context.
Key measures
Efficacy and safety outcomes of MICS versus conventional cardiac surgery; technological advancements; procedural innovations
Outcomes reported
The review examined the historical development, current state, and future prospects of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), comparing its efficacy and safety to traditional open cardiac surgery methods. The study assessed advantages, limitations, and emerging technological trends in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.