Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities

Pablo Madriaza, Ghayda Hassan, Sébastien Brouillette‐Alarie, Aoudou Njingouo Mounchingam, Loïc Durocher‐Corfa, Eugene Borokhovski, David Pickup, Sabrina Paillé

Campbell Systematic Reviews · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Campbell Systematic Review synthesises empirical evidence on the impacts of exposure to hate content in online and traditional media on individuals and communities. The authors identified and analysed 55 studies containing 101 effect sizes across 43 distinct outcome measures, addressing a gap in the literature regarding bystander exposure rather than direct victimisation. The review aims to inform the development of evidence-based intervention programmes adapted to contemporary media environments.

UK applicability

The findings are potentially applicable to United Kingdom policy and practice regarding online safety regulation, media literacy initiatives, and community resilience programmes, particularly given the prevalence of both digital and traditional media platforms in the UK. However, applicability may vary depending on whether the included studies reflect UK-specific contexts and whether outcomes align with UK regulatory and public health priorities.

Key measures

Effect sizes across 43 different outcomes; correlational, experimental, and quasi-experimental study designs; searches across 20 databases, 51 websites, and Google covering the period up to December 2021

Outcomes reported

The study synthesised empirical evidence on how exposure to hate in online and traditional media affects outcomes for individuals and groups, examining 55 studies with 101 effect sizes classified into 43 different outcome categories.

Theme
Marketing, media & food environments
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
DOI
10.1002/cl2.70018
Catalogue ID
SNmojmgn8w-vapapn

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.