Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents – A Scoping Review

Viktor Schønning, Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland, Leif Edvard Aarø, Jens Christoffer Skogen

Frontiers in Psychology · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This scoping review synthesised evidence on social media use and adolescent mental health, finding that approximately three-quarters of included studies focused on pathological outcomes rather than positive associations. The authors note that few studies differentiated between distinct types of social media interactions, which likely have differential effects on well-being. The review highlights a gap in the literature regarding positive mental health outcomes and more granular measurement of specific social media behaviours.

UK applicability

The findings are directly relevant to UK policy and practice around adolescent digital wellbeing and online safety. The identified research gap suggests a need for UK-based studies that examine both protective and harmful effects of social media use amongst British adolescents.

Key measures

Proportion of included studies examining social media and mental health pathology versus positive outcomes; categorisation of different forms of social media interactions and their associations with mental health

Outcomes reported

The review examined associations between social media use and mental health and well-being outcomes in adolescents, documenting the prevalence of studies focusing on pathological versus positive outcomes.

Theme
Marketing, media & food environments
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Scoping review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949
Catalogue ID
SNmojoljd7-pw0v84

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.