Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewedRegenerative

A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

Matteo Dainese, Emily A. Martin, Marcelo A. Aizen, Matthias Albrecht, Ígnasi Bartomeus, Riccardo Bommarco, Luísa G. Carvalheiro, Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Vesna Gagic, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Jaboury Ghazoul, Heather Grab, Mattias Jonsson, Daniel S. Karp, Christina M. Kennedy, David Kleijn, Claire Kremen, Douglas A. Landis, Deborah K. Letourneau, Lorenzo Marini, Katja Poveda, Romina Rader, Henrik G. Smith, Teja Tscharntke, Georg K.S. Andersson, Isabelle Badenhausser, Svenja Baensch, Antônio Diego M. Bezerra, Felix J.J.A. Bianchi, Virginie Boreux, Vincent Bretagnolle, Berta Caballero‐López, Pablo Cavigliasso, Aleksandar Ćetković, Natacha P. Chacoff, Alice Claßen, Sarah Cusser, Felipe Deodato da Silva e Silva, G.A. de Groot, Jan‐Hendrik Dudenhöffer, Johan Ekroos, Thijs P. M. Fijen, Pierre Franck, Breno Magalhães Freitas, Michael P. D. Garratt, Claudio Gratton, Juliana Hipólito, Andrea Holzschuh, Lauren Hunt, Aaron L. Iverson, Shalene Jha, Tamar Keasar, Tania N. Kim, Miriam Kishinevsky, Björn K. Klatt, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Kristin M. Krewenka, Smitha Krishnan, Ashley Larsen, Claire Lavigne, Heidi Liere, Bea Maas, Rachel E. Mallinger, Eliana Martínez Pachón, Alejandra Martínez‐Salinas, Timothy D. Meehan, Matthew G. E. Mitchell, Gonzalo A. R. Molina, Maike Nesper, L. Anders Nilsson, Megan E. O’Rourke, Marcell K. Peters, Milan Plećaš, Simon G. Potts, Davi de Lacerda Ramos, Jay A. Rosenheim, Maj Rundlöf, Adrien Rusch, Agustín Sáez, Jeroen Scheper, Matthias Schleuning, Julia M. Schmack, Amber R. Sciligo, Colleen L. Seymour, Dara A. Stanley, Rebecca Stewart, Jane C. Stout, Louis Sutter, Mayura B. Takada, Hisatomo Taki, Giovanni Tamburini, Matthias Tschumi, Blandina Felipe Viana, Catrin Westphal, Bryony K. Willcox, S. D. Wratten, Akira Yoshioka, Carlos Zaragoza‐Trello, Wei Zhang, Yi Zou

Science Advances · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This global synthesis of 89 studies synthesised evidence from 1475 locations to determine whether crop-related ecosystem services depend on high species richness or can be maintained by dominant species. The analysis demonstrates that pollinator and enemy richness directly support ecosystem services independently of abundance and dominance, and that up to 50% of yield losses from landscape simplification result from biodiversity loss in service-providing organisms. The findings establish that maintaining biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is critical for sustained agroecosystem productivity.

Regional applicability

The findings are directly relevant to UK agricultural policy and practice, as the country's intensive farming landscapes have experienced significant pollinator and natural enemy declines. These results support arguments for agri-environment schemes and landscape-level interventions that preserve species richness in farmland, particularly given the UK's commitments to biodiversity net gain.

Key measures

Species richness, abundance, and dominance of pollinators and natural enemies; pollination ecosystem services; biological pest control services; crop yields; effects of landscape simplification

Outcomes reported

The study quantified the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination, biological pest control, and crop yields across 1475 locations. It measured the proportion of negative effects from landscape simplification attributable to losses in biodiversity of service-providing organisms.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Regenerative & agroecological farming
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
Catalogue ID
SNmojxdd8h-911uyt

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.