Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events

Jonathan Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Guy Shalev, Oren Gilon, Logan M. Qualls, Hoshin V. Gupta, Grey Nearing

Hydrology and earth system sciences · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Abstract. The most accurate rainfall–runoff predictions are currently based on deep learning. There is a concern among hydrologists that the predictive accuracy of data-driven models based on deep learning may not be reliable in extrapolation or for predicting extreme events. This study tests that hypothesis using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and an LSTM variant that is architecturally constrained to conserve mass. The LSTM network (and the mass-conserving LSTM variant) remained relatively accurate in predicting extreme (high-return-period) events compared with both a conceptual model (the Sacramento Model) and a process-based model (the US National Water Model), even when extreme events were not included in the training period. Adding mass balance constraints to the data-driven

Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Other
DOI
10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022
Catalogue ID
SNmokeh51n-80bi73
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.