Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Magnetic and Mechanical Design of a 16 T Common Coil Dipole for an FCC

F. Toral, Javier Munilla, Tiina Salmi

IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper presents the electromagnetic and mechanical design of a 16 T common coil dipole magnet for the proposed EuroCirCol 100 TeV circular hadron collider. Through iterative optimisation and three-dimensional finite element modelling, the authors demonstrate a feasible magnet design that achieves required field quality specifications whilst constraining superconductor usage and accounting for substantial mechanical stresses. The work represents a critical feasibility study for next-generation accelerator infrastructure.

UK applicability

As a fundamental physics infrastructure design study, direct applicability to UK agricultural and food systems research is not apparent. However, the advanced superconducting magnet technology developed may have future applications in UK research instrumentation.

Key measures

Magnetic field strength (16 T), field quality, superconductor volume, stress distribution, deformations under Lorentz forces

Outcomes reported

The study presents an optimised electromagnetic design for a 16 T common coil dipole magnet meeting field quality requirements whilst minimising superconductor volume. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate stress distribution and deformations under high Lorentz forces to establish design feasibility.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Laboratory / in vitro
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Other
DOI
10.1109/tasc.2018.2797909
Catalogue ID
SNmotmrb9f-owgfkj

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.