Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Precision Evaluation of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>η</mml:mi></mml:math>- and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>η</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>-Pole Contributions to Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering in the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon

Simon Holz, Martin Hoferichter, Bai-Long Hoid, Bastian Kubis

Physical Review Letters · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This theoretical physics study presents precision calculations of the contributions to the muon's anomalous magnetic moment arising from η and η′ pseudoscalar meson intermediate states in hadronic light-by-light scattering. Using dispersion relations and implementing constraints from decay widths, spectral data, chiral symmetry, and meson couplings, the authors derive transition form factors and quantify pole contributions, including the first estimate of factorization-breaking effects from a₂ tensor meson exchange. The results advance the theoretical precision needed to compare with experimental measurements of the muon g−2 anomaly.

UK applicability

This is fundamental particle physics research without direct application to UK agricultural, soil health, or human nutrition contexts. It does not address farming systems, food production, or dietary outcomes relevant to Vitagri's core focus.

Key measures

Transition form factors (TFFs) for η(′)→γγ; anomalous magnetic moment contributions (aμ) in units of 10⁻¹¹; factorization-breaking corrections from a₂ tensor meson exchange

Outcomes reported

The study calculated transition form factors for η and η′ mesons to two virtual photons, implementing multiple low- and high-energy constraints. Final results quantified the pole contributions to the muon's anomalous magnetic moment: η pole = 14.7(9)×10⁻¹¹ and η′ pole = 13.5(7)×10⁻¹¹, with a combined pseudoscalar-pole contribution of 91.2⁻²·⁴⁺²·⁹×10⁻¹¹.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Theoretical calculation with dispersion relation analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.134.171902
Catalogue ID
SNmotmrgcd-m85ydd

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.