Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Mechanical Structure for the PSI Canted-Cosine-Theta (CCT) Magnet Program

Giuseppe Montenero, Bernhard Auchmann, Lucas Brouwer, Ciro Calzolaio, S. Caspi, G. Rolando, S. Sanfilippo

IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper describes the mechanical structure design for the Paul Scherrer Institut's Canted-Cosine-Theta superconducting magnet programme. The CCT technology offers inherent stress management benefits for high-field accelerator magnets, particularly Nb₃Sn designs, but requires careful external mechanical support to compensate for the current-density dilution caused by internal structural features. The authors present a bladder-and-key-based mechanical structure with associated two and three-dimensional finite element analyses and tolerance assessments.

UK applicability

This paper is not applicable to UK agricultural research or food systems. It addresses high-energy physics magnet engineering and has no relevance to farming, soil health, nutrition, or food production.

Key measures

Coil stresses, engineering current density, mechanical stiffness, tolerance analysis under loading, cooling, and powering conditions

Outcomes reported

The paper reports the design, analysis, and tolerance evaluation of an external mechanical structure (based on the bladder and key concept) for the Paul Scherrer Institut's Canted-Cosine-Theta magnet prototype, including two-dimensional and three-dimensional mechanical analysis across loading, cooling, and powering stages.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Laboratory / in vitro
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.1109/tasc.2017.2787596
Catalogue ID
SNmotmromd-aojkil

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.