Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Effects of nitrogen reduction on wheat yield and quality in different ecological environments

Cheng Jiasheng, Qiao Xiangmei, Abbas Sakina, Wang Zhilong, Wang Zhiwei, Yu Wu, Ya-Xiong YU

African Journal of Agricultural Research · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2024 study investigates the trade-offs between reduced nitrogen fertiliser inputs and wheat productivity and quality across diverse growing conditions. As suggested by the title, the research explores whether nitrogen reduction strategies can be optimised for specific ecological environments without disproportionate yield or quality losses, relevant to both sustainability and food security goals.

UK applicability

Findings may be partially applicable to UK cereal production, particularly if the study includes temperate climates. UK growers and policy-makers face regulatory pressure to reduce nitrogen inputs; evidence on environment-specific optimisation could inform precision agriculture and fertiliser policy, though local soil, weather, and cultivar factors would require adaptation.

Key measures

Wheat grain yield; grain quality traits (likely including protein content, falling number, test weight, or mineral composition); nitrogen application rate comparisons

Outcomes reported

The study examined how reducing nitrogen fertiliser application affects wheat grain yield and quality parameters (protein, micronutrient content, or baking properties) across different growing environments or ecological zones.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Arable cropping systems
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.5897/ajar2024.16692
Catalogue ID
SNmov5i0e3-gyfti2

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.