Summary
This meta-analytical study quantified variation in nutrient removal coefficients for maize and wheat by synthesising field experiment and on-farm data into a tiered estimation framework. Statistical and machine learning models achieved moderate predictive accuracy (R² 0.32–0.45) on replicated field trials but performed poorly on on-farm data (R² 0.08–0.36), highlighting substantial data limitations. The authors recommend using regional (Tier 2) coefficient estimates for national and global nutrient budget assessments until on-farm data quality and coverage improve.
UK applicability
The findings are relevant to UK arable farming as maize and wheat are significant UK crops; however, the study is global in scope and may require adaptation of regional Tier 2 coefficients specific to UK conditions. The poor predictive performance on on-farm data suggests that UK farm-level nutrient balance estimates would benefit from locally calibrated coefficients rather than reliance on global models.
Key measures
Harvest index (HI); nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations in crop grain and residues; model prediction accuracy (R²); Tier 1 (global mean), Tier 2 (regional), and Tier 3 (statistical/machine learning) coefficient estimates
Outcomes reported
The study assessed variation in nutrient removal coefficients (harvest index, nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium concentrations in grain and residues) for maize and wheat using three tiered estimation approaches. Mixed-effects and random forest models were developed to predict these coefficients globally, with accuracy varying substantially between replicated field experiment data and on-farm data.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.