Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Tiered maize and wheat nutrient removal coefficients estimated from available data

Cameron I. Ludemann, Renske Hijbeek, Marloes P. van Loon, T. Scott Murrell, Achim Dobermann, M.K. van Ittersum

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This meta-analytical study quantified variation in nutrient removal coefficients for maize and wheat by synthesising field experiment and on-farm data into a tiered estimation framework. Statistical and machine learning models achieved moderate predictive accuracy (R² 0.32–0.45) on replicated field trials but performed poorly on on-farm data (R² 0.08–0.36), highlighting substantial data limitations. The authors recommend using regional (Tier 2) coefficient estimates for national and global nutrient budget assessments until on-farm data quality and coverage improve.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK arable farming as maize and wheat are significant UK crops; however, the study is global in scope and may require adaptation of regional Tier 2 coefficients specific to UK conditions. The poor predictive performance on on-farm data suggests that UK farm-level nutrient balance estimates would benefit from locally calibrated coefficients rather than reliance on global models.

Key measures

Harvest index (HI); nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations in crop grain and residues; model prediction accuracy (R²); Tier 1 (global mean), Tier 2 (regional), and Tier 3 (statistical/machine learning) coefficient estimates

Outcomes reported

The study assessed variation in nutrient removal coefficients (harvest index, nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium concentrations in grain and residues) for maize and wheat using three tiered estimation approaches. Mixed-effects and random forest models were developed to predict these coefficients globally, with accuracy varying substantially between replicated field experiment data and on-farm data.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.1007/s10705-024-10381-6
Catalogue ID
SNmov5io1j-hbpmzl

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.