Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Effects of elevated CO₂ on protein concentration of food crops

Taub, D.R. et al.

2008

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This meta-analysis by Taub et al. synthesises experimental evidence on the effect of elevated atmospheric CO₂ on the protein concentration of food crops. The study likely reports a consistent and statistically significant reduction in protein content — often estimated at around 10–15% — across a range of staple crops including wheat, rice, and barley when grown under elevated CO₂ conditions. The findings raise important nutritional concerns, as rising atmospheric CO₂ may gradually erode the protein quality and density of the global food supply independent of other agricultural management factors.

UK applicability

The findings are broadly applicable to UK arable production, where wheat and barley are dominant staple crops; if atmospheric CO₂ continues to rise, UK-grown cereals may exhibit declining protein concentrations, with implications for flour quality, animal feed nutritional value, and human dietary protein intake.

Key measures

Protein concentration (% dry weight); CO₂ treatment levels (ppm); crop species and type; percentage change in protein relative to ambient CO₂ controls

Outcomes reported

The study examined changes in protein concentration in food crops grown under elevated CO₂ conditions, likely finding consistent reductions in protein content across multiple staple crop species. It sought to quantify the magnitude of this 'CO₂ dilution' effect and assess its implications for human nutrition.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Crop nutrient density & food quality
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Arable cereals
Catalogue ID
XL0113

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.