Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification

Jules Pretty, Tim G. Benton, Zareen Pervez Bharucha, Lynn V. Dicks, Cornelia Butler Flora, H. Charles J. Godfray, Dave Goulson, Sue Hartley, Nicolas Lampkin, Carol Morris, Gary M. Pierzynski, P. V. Vara Prasad, John P. Reganold, Johan Rockström, Pete Smith, Peter S. Thorne, S. D. Wratten

Nature Sustainability · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This global assessment, published in Nature Sustainability, examines the evidence base for redesigning agricultural systems to achieve sustainable intensification—increasing productivity whilst reducing environmental footprint. Drawing on an international team of experts across agronomy, ecology, and policy, the paper synthesises findings on which system redesigns deliver improved yields, soil health, and ecological outcomes. The authors appear to argue that well-designed intensification coupled with ecological principles offers a viable pathway to meeting food security demands whilst mitigating agriculture's environmental burden.

UK applicability

The findings are applicable to UK farming policy and practice, particularly for informing strategies to balance domestic food production with environmental commitments (net zero, biodiversity goals). The evidence base would support UK farm subsidy reform and agri-environment scheme design moving towards results-based sustainable intensification.

Key measures

Productivity gains, resource use efficiency, environmental impact reduction, adoption rates of sustainable intensification practices

Outcomes reported

The study assessed evidence on agricultural system redesign approaches that increase productivity whilst reducing environmental impact across global contexts. The assessment evaluated outcomes related to yield, resource efficiency, and ecological sustainability metrics.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Regenerative & agroecological farming
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo5hf-k3eed4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.