Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Long‐term organic farming and floral diversity promotes stability of bee communities in agroecosystems

Elias H. Bloom, Javier Gutiérrez Illán, Matthew R. Brousil, John P. Reganold, Tobin D. Northfield, David W. Crowder

Functional Ecology · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This field study of 36 farms demonstrates that longer-term organic management (>0 years) promotes bee community assembly through niche-based rather than stochastic processes, resulting in reduced inter-annual species turnover and greater community stability. The authors show that bee communities reflect species-specific resource preferences for floral and nesting resources, and that extended organic practices stabilise these resource-use patterns. In urbanised landscapes, simplified floral resources drove bee species loss, suggesting landscape context modulates the stabilising effects of organic management on pollinator communities.

UK applicability

These findings are directly relevant to UK organic farming policy and pollinator conservation strategies, given similar temperate agroecosystems and regulatory frameworks promoting organic production. Long-term organic conversion programmes and enhanced floral provision in both farmed and surrounding landscapes appear warranted to stabilise bee communities, though UK-specific landscape complexity and urbanisation patterns would require local validation.

Key measures

Bee community composition and diversity; floral resource availability; niche-based and stochastic species abundance models; additive partition of beta diversity; species turnover across years; jackknife sensitivity analyses

Outcomes reported

The study measured bee community assembly mechanisms, species turnover, and beta diversity across farms with varying lengths of organic management (0–43 years). It assessed how niche-based versus stochastic processes and floral resource turnover influenced bee community structure and stability.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Regenerative & agroecological farming
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Organic systems
DOI
10.1111/1365-2435.14428
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo5hf-udfh39

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.