Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Achievable agricultural soil carbon sequestration across Europe from country‐specific estimates

Leonor Rodrigues, Brieuc Hardy, Bruno Huyghebeart, Julia Fohrafellner, Dario Fornara, Gabriela Barančíková, Téresa G. Bárcena, Maarten De Boever, Claudia Di Bene, Dalia Feizienė, Thomas Kätterer, Péter László, Lilian O’Sullivan, Daria Seitz, Jens Leifeld

Global Change Biology · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic literature review evaluated the feasibility of soil carbon sequestration as a climate change mitigation strategy across 24 European countries. The authors found substantial variation in achievable SCS potentials (0.1–27% of agricultural GHG emissions) depending on national environmental conditions and agricultural practices, with none reaching the 4 per 1000 initiative's target. The analysis highlights the critical importance of country-specific knowledge, standardised measurement methodologies, and consideration of controlling factors and trade-offs for realistic SCS policy implementation.

UK applicability

The United Kingdom, as a European nation with diverse agricultural systems and climate zones, would have been included in or informed by this analysis. The findings suggest UK-specific estimates would be necessary to establish realistic SCS targets and policy pathways, and that any national carbon sequestration programme must account for regional soil types, farming practices, and practical implementation constraints.

Key measures

Annual soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates (expressed as percentage of current agricultural GHG emissions offset); country-specific SCS potential; complexity tier of measurement approaches (tier 1–3)

Outcomes reported

The study quantified country-specific soil carbon sequestration (SCS) potentials for 24 European countries, estimating that between 0.1% and 27% of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions could be compensated annually through SCS measures. It assessed the feasibility of achieving the 4 per 1000 initiative's aspirational goal across different national contexts.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/gcb.15897
Catalogue ID
BFmovi21by-ycasjg

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.