Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Land‐based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country

Stephanie Roe, Charlotte Streck, Robert Beach, Jonah Busch, Melissa Chapman, Vassilis Daioglou, Андре Депперманн, Jonathan Doelman, Jeremy Emmet‐Booth, Jens Engelmann, Oliver Fricko, Chad Frischmann, Jason Funk, Giacomo Grassi, Bronson W. Griscom, Peter Havlík, Steef V. Hanssen, Florian Humpenöder, David M. Landholm, Guy Lomax, Johannes Lehmann, Leah Mesnildrey, G.J. Nabuurs, Alexander Popp, Charlotte Rivard, Jonathan Sanderman, Brent Sohngen, Pete Smith, Elke Stehfest, Dominic Woolf, Deborah Lawrence

Global Change Biology · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive assessment synthesises bottom-up sectoral estimates and integrated assessment models to quantify cost-effective land-based climate mitigation potential globally at 8–13.8 GtCO₂ eq yr⁻¹ by 2050. The analysis reveals that forests and ecosystem protection contribute approximately 50% of cost-effective potential, with agriculture contributing 35% and demand-side measures 15%. The study emphasises that 80% of identified potential lies in developing countries and least-developed countries, where feasibility barriers related to governance, investment capacity, and socio-cultural conditions pose significant implementation challenges.

UK applicability

The UK, as a developed nation with established governance structures and economic capacity, likely faces lower feasibility barriers than identified in the report's focus on developing countries. The findings on demand-side measures and ecosystem protection may be relevant to UK policy, though country-specific analysis of UK land-based mitigation potential and barriers would be needed to determine precise applicability.

Key measures

Cost-effective mitigation potential (GtCO₂ eq yr⁻¹) at $100/tCO₂ eq threshold; technical potential by land-based measure; regional and country-level feasibility assessment; mitigation efficiency and co-benefits provision

Outcomes reported

The study quantified cost-effective land-based climate mitigation potential at 8–13.8 GtCO₂ eq yr⁻¹ between 2020 and 2050 across 20 measures in >200 countries, and assessed implementation feasibility at the country level. Results show regional variation in potential and identified governance, economic, and socio-cultural barriers to realisation, particularly in developing countries.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/gcb.15873
Catalogue ID
BFmovi23dp-4xfqki

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.