Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Scientific outcome of the IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop on biodiversity and climate change

Hans Otto-Portner, Bob Scholes, John Agard, Emma Archer, Almut Arneth, Xuemei Bai, David K. A. Barnes, Michael T. Burrows, Lung S. Chan, Wai Lung Cheung, Sarah E. Diamond, Camila I. Donatti, Carlos M. Duarte, Nico Eisenhauer, Wendy Foden, Maria A. Gasalla, Collins Handa, Thomas Hickler, Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg, Kazuhito Ichii, Ute Jacob, Gregory Insarov, Wolfgang Kiessling, Paul Leadley, Rik Leemans, Lisa A. Levin, Michelle Lim, Shobha Maharaj, Shunsuke Managi, Pablo A. Marquet, Pamela McElwee, Guy F. Midgley, Thierry Oberdorff, David Obura, Balgis Osman Elasha, Ram Pandit, Unai Pascual, Aliny P. F. Pires, Alexander Popp, Victòria Reyes-García, Mahesh Sankaran, Josef Settele, Yunne‐Jai Shin, Sintayehu W. Dejene, Pete Smith, Nadja Steiner, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Raman Sukumar, Christopher H. Trisos, Adalberto Luís Val, Jianguo Wu, Edvin Aldrian, Camille Parmesan, Ramón Pichs-Madruga, Debra Roberts, Alex D. Rogers, Sandra Dı́az, Markus Fischer, Shizuka Hashimoto, Sandra Lavorel, Ning Wu, Hien T. Ngo

2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Scientific Outcome report documents the findings of the first IPCC-IPBES co-sponsored workshop (December 2020), synthesising the emerging state of knowledge on interactions between climate change and biodiversity loss. The report contextualises these dual crises within international policy frameworks including the Paris Agreement and post-2020 biodiversity framework, and provides options for integrated action to support human wellbeing. The seven-section report aims to inform decision-making and identify research priorities at the climate-biodiversity nexus.

UK applicability

The report provides global-scale policy guidance applicable to UK climate and biodiversity commitments under the Paris Agreement and Convention on Biological Diversity. UK policymakers and land managers may find the integrated framework and action options relevant to designing domestic policies that address both climate mitigation and nature recovery.

Key measures

Qualitative synthesis of the state of knowledge on climate-biodiversity interactions and their human impacts; policy-relevant options for action; identified research gaps

Outcomes reported

The Scientific Outcome synthesises emerging knowledge on the interconnections between climate change and biodiversity loss, identifies implications for human wellbeing, and outlines options for integrated action. The report identifies key knowledge gaps requiring further scientific research to support decision-making across climate and biodiversity policy frameworks.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.4923212
Catalogue ID
BFmovi23dp-smfxgv

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.