Summary
This qualitative study examined how bullying and cyberbullying are addressed in UK psychological and legal practice through interviews with psychologists and lawyers. The research identified three main themes: the need for clearer professional definitions and cross-disciplinary dialogue; gaps in current psychological risk assessment procedures; and the importance of educational interventions. The study recommends revisions to clinical psychological practices and legal policies to improve mental health outcomes and reduce bullying prevalence.
UK applicability
The study was conducted in the United Kingdom and directly examined UK clinical psychological practices and legal frameworks, making its findings directly applicable to UK mental health services and policy reform. The recommendations for revising clinical assessments and legal policies are specifically targeted at UK practitioners and policymakers.
Key measures
Thematic codes derived from interviews with 5 practitioner psychologists and 4 lawyers regarding assessment practices, legal frameworks, and intervention approaches
Outcomes reported
The study identified gaps in how mental health practitioners incorporate bullying and cyberbullying history into psychological risk assessments, and documented both the existence and limitations of current UK legislation addressing these issues.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.