Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Using the quality circle approach to empower disadvantaged youth in addressing cyberbullying: an exploration across five European countries

Jayne Hamilton, Noel Purdy, Roy A. Willems, Peter K. Smith, Catherine Culbert, Antonella Brighi, Nora Fiedler, Annalisa Guarini, Consuelo Mameli, Damiano Menin, Herbert Scheithauer, Trijntje Völlink

Pastoral Care in Education · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

The Blurred Lives project employed a Quality Circle approach—small, peer-led problem-solving groups—to engage 237 disadvantaged adolescents across five European countries in co-creating anti-cyberbullying resources for multiple audiences. Building on data from 2,658 baseline surveys, participating pupils produced diverse outputs including videos, comic strips, board games, and leaflets. Whilst most participants reported increased cyberbullying knowledge, e-safety and problem-solving skills, and enhanced confidence, the study identified important implementation prerequisites including adequate school support and careful calibration of facilitator involvement.

UK applicability

The findings are applicable to UK secondary schools seeking to embed pupil voice in safeguarding policy and e-safety education, particularly in areas of socio-economic disadvantage. The emphasis on school-level infrastructure and staffing support reflects resource constraints relevant to UK contexts.

Key measures

Pupil feedback on cyberbullying knowledge, e-safety skills, problem-solving skills, confidence, group work skills; qualitative documentation of operational challenges

Outcomes reported

The study measured pupil knowledge of cyberbullying and e-safety skills, problem-solving abilities, confidence levels, and group work skills following participation in Quality Circle groups. Operational challenges related to school-level support, planning, staffing, and the balance between facilitator support and pupil agency were also documented.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Mixed-methods field study with initial survey and co-participatory intervention
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Other
DOI
10.1080/02643944.2020.1788127
Catalogue ID
BFmovi2556-ia6v88

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.