Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Harmonizing food systems emissions accounting for more effective climate action

Kevin Karl, Francesco N. Tubiello, Monica Crippa, Joseph Poore, Matthew Hayek, Philippe Benoit, Minpeng Chen, Marc Corbeels, Alessandro Flammini, Sarah Garland, Adrian Leip, Shelby C. McClelland, Erik Mencos Contreras, David Sandalow, Roberta Quadrelli, Tek B. Sapkota, Cynthia Rosenzweig

Environmental Research Food Systems · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This synthesis reviews the climate impact of food systems—spanning production, land-use change, supply chains and waste management—which account for over 30% of annual anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. The authors identify significant inconsistencies in current emissions quantification methods and propose a harmonised accounting framework to be developed by an IPCC-aligned expert committee. The framework addresses system boundary definition, sectoral emissions allocation, critical research priorities, and mitigation impact evaluation, positioning food systems emissions standardisation as essential for coordinated global climate action and net-zero progress.

UK applicability

The proposed harmonised framework would benefit UK government and industry reporting under UK Climate Change Act obligations and corporate net-zero commitments. Integration with international policy processes (UNFCCC and UN Food Systems Summit) could align UK food systems climate accounting with global standards, improving consistency in emissions monitoring and enabling more effective domestic and supply-chain mitigation strategies.

Key measures

Greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O) as percentage of anthropogenic sources; system boundaries; sectoral emissions allocation protocols; activity data and emissions factors

Outcomes reported

The paper synthesises research on food systems' contributions to climate change and proposes a harmonised accounting framework with four key recommendations for standardising emissions quantification and reporting.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1088/2976-601x/ad8fb3
Catalogue ID
BFmovi28q3-wmsx9l

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.