Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Bundling measures for food systems transformation: a global, multimodel assessment

Marina Sundiang, Thais Diniz Oliveira, Daniel Mason-D’Croz, Matthew Gibson, Felicitas Beier, Lauren Benavidez, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Astrid Bos, Maksym Chepeliev, David M. Chen, Thijs de Lange, Jonathan Doelman, Shahnila Dunston, Stefan Frank, Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlík, Jordan Hristov, Jonas Jägermeyr, Marta Kozicka, Marijke Kuiper, Page Kyle, Hermann Lotze‐Campen, Hermen Luchtenbelt, Abhijeet Mishra, Christoph Müller, Gerald C. Nelson, Amanda Palazzo, Ignácio Pérez Domínguez, Alexander Popp, Ronald D. Sands, Marco Springmann, Elke Stehfest, Timothy B. Sulser, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Gianmaria Tassinari, Ferike Thom, Philip K. Thornton, Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Willem‐Jan van Zeist, Hans van Meijl, Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, Detlef P. van Vuuren, H.H.E. van Zanten, Isabelle Weindl, Keith Wiebe, Xin Zhao, Mario Herrero

The Lancet Planetary Health · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This multimodel assessment applies ten state-of-the-art global economic models to evaluate how four key food systems transformation measures—increased agricultural productivity, halved food loss and waste, shifts to healthier diets aligned with EAT-Lancet reference standards, and economy-wide climate mitigation to 1·5°C—perform individually and in combination. The study employs decomposition analysis to distinguish individual effects, total effects within bundles, and interaction effects, thereby identifying complementarities and trade-offs that emerge from simultaneous implementation across food systems. The research provides quantitative evidence on the magnitude and uncertainty of bundled interventions needed to address concurrent hunger and environmental crises.

UK applicability

The findings have direct relevance to UK policy, particularly for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Climate Change Committee, as the modelling includes economy-wide climate mitigation pathways aligned with domestic net-zero commitments. The dietary shift scenarios, based on the EAT-Lancet framework, align with UK nutrition guidance and inform food security and public health policy discussions.

Key measures

Food security outcomes (hunger risk), greenhouse gas emissions reductions, agricultural land use change, and interaction effects between bundled measures; modelled from 2020 to 2050

Outcomes reported

The study quantified the individual and combined impacts of four key food systems transformation measures (agricultural productivity, food loss and waste reduction, dietary shift, and climate mitigation) on hunger, environmental outcomes, and agricultural land use through 2050 using ten global economic models. A decomposition analysis identified complementarities and trade-offs when measures were implemented simultaneously.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food security & global nutrition
Study type
Research
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101339
Catalogue ID
BFmovi2bj3-c48etb

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.