Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Global Carbon Budget 2016

Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Josep G. Canadell, Stephen Sitch, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Andrew C. Manning, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, R. A. Houghton, Ralph F. Keeling, Simone R. Alin, Oliver Andrews, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise Chini, Philippe Ciais, Kim Currie, Christine Delire, Scott C. Doney, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thanos Gkritzalis, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, Mario Hoppema, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Joe R. Melton, Nicolas Metzl, Frank J. Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka, Kevin O’Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Christian Rödenbeck, Joe Salisbury, Ute Schuster, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Adrienne J. Sutton, Taro Takahashi, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Viovy, Anthony P. Walker, A. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle

Earth system science data · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive global carbon budget assessment synthesises multiple independent data streams, models, and methodologies to quantify anthropogenic CO2 emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere for 2006–2015. The study combines energy statistics, cement production data, land-cover change observations, fire activity records, ocean measurements, and dynamic global vegetation models to estimate all major carbon budget components with characterised uncertainties. The analysis supports climate policy development and future climate change projections by providing integrated, internally consistent estimates of the global carbon cycle.

UK applicability

As a global-scale assessment, this carbon budget framework underpins UK climate policy development and carbon accounting methodologies. The paper's approach to quantifying land-use change emissions and terrestrial carbon sinks is directly relevant to UK agricultural and land-use policy, including devolved environmental targets and emissions reporting under the Climate Change Act.

Key measures

Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (EFF); emissions from land-use change (ELUC); global atmospheric CO2 concentration and growth rate (GATM); mean ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN); global residual terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND); annual anomalies and trends in carbon fluxes; uncertainties reported as ±1σ

Outcomes reported

The study quantified all major components of the global carbon budget for 2006–2015, including CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry, land-use change, atmospheric CO2 concentration growth, ocean CO2 sink, and residual terrestrial CO2 sink, with reported uncertainties. The research integrated diverse data sources, algorithms, models, and community interpretation to assess anthropogenic carbon redistribution among atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
Catalogue ID
BFmowc1xyr-lgtlre

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.