Summary
Ticks impose major health and economic losses on the livestock sector of Pakistan, yet uncertainty-aware maps of tick burden remain scarce. We focused on the two most common disease transmitting tick species, Rhipicephalus microplus and Hyalomma anatolicum, to produce exposure-adjusted district-level abundance estimates and predictions for unsampled areas in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK). We compiled heterogeneous tick count records and standardized them per 100,000 animals. District-level climate and physiographic covariates were summarized via principal components analysis. Bayesian spatial models were fit in R-INLA using Gaussian likelihoods and BYM2 over a hybrid adjacency matrix. Competing non-spatial and spatial models were compared, and the best model was used to generate posterior predictions and 95% credible intervals for unsampled districts. Spatial models outperformed non-spatial alternatives and calibrated well. Model robustness was confirmed through eight independent 80/20 train-test splits, showing strong generalization with consistent predictions across seeds. For unsampled areas, R. microplus exhibited a pronounced north-south gradient with high predicted means but wide intervals in the northern highlands, indicating information gaps. H. anatolicum predictions were highest and most precise in southern Punjab. Sensitivity analysis highlighted a dominant spatial component, with modest contributions from PC1 and PC2. The Bayesian spatial models using the Besag-York-Mollie framework delivered comparable, exposure-adjusted tick abundance maps while quantifying uncertainty to guide surveillance. Results suggest a need for immediate control in confirmed hotspots and recommend targeted field sampling in high-uncertainty districts. The workflow generalizes to other vectors, pathogens, and regions for evidence-based livestock health planning.
Outcomes reported
Ticks impose major health and economic losses on the livestock sector of Pakistan, yet uncertainty-aware maps of tick burden remain scarce. We focused on the two most common disease transmitting tick species, Rhipicephalus microplus and Hyalomma anatolicum, to produce exposure-adjusted district-level abundance estimates and predictions for unsampled areas in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK). We compiled heterogeneous tick count records and standardized them per 100,000 animals. District-level climate and physiographic covariates were summarized via principal components analysis. Bayesian spatial models were fit in R-INLA using Gaussian likelihoods and BYM2 over a hybrid adjacency matrix. Competing non-spatial and spatial models were compared, and the best model was used to generate posterior predictions and 95% credible intervals for unsampled districts. Spatial models outperformed non-spatial alternatives and calibrated well. Model robustness was confirmed through eight independent 80/20 train-test splits, showing strong generalization with consistent predictions across seeds. For unsampled areas, R. microplus exhibited a pronounced north-south gradient with high predicted means but wide intervals in the northern highlands, indicating information gaps. H. anatolicum predictions were highest and most precise in southern Punjab. Sensitivity analysis highlighted a dominant spatial component, with modest contributions from PC1 and PC2. The Bayesian spatial models using the Besag-York-Mollie framework delivered comparable, exposure-adjusted tick abundance maps while quantifying uncertainty to guide surveillance. Results suggest a need for immediate control in confirmed hotspots and recommend targeted field sampling in high-uncertainty districts. The workflow generalizes to other vectors, pathogens, and regions for evidence-based livestock health planning.
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.