Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Digital Tools and Decision Support Systems in Agroecology: Benefits, Challenges, and Practical Implementations

Dimitra Petraki, Ioannis Gazoulis, Metaxia Kokkini, Marios Danaskos, Panagiotis Kanatas, Andreas Rekkas, Ilias Travlos

Agronomy · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review synthesises evidence on the role of digital tools and decision support systems in supporting agroecological farming transitions. Whilst digital solutions demonstrate significant potential for enhancing soil and water management, integrated pest management, and resource efficiency, adoption remains constrained by low digital literacy, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns about real-world effectiveness. The authors conclude that realising this potential requires a holistic approach integrating technology with hands-on training, policy support, and continued empirical research.

UK applicability

The findings on digital literacy barriers and infrastructure gaps are relevant to UK farming contexts, where adoption of decision support systems varies widely across farm sizes and regions. Policy recommendations on training and infrastructure investment could inform UK agricultural extension services and digital inclusion strategies for rural communities.

Key measures

Qualitative assessment of digital tool adoption barriers (digital literacy, infrastructure, real-world effectiveness); benefits for soil management, water management, integrated pest management, and resource use efficiency

Outcomes reported

The study examined the benefits, challenges, and practical implementations of digital tools and decision support systems in agroecological farming through literature review and case study analysis. Findings addressed adoption barriers, effectiveness in soil and water management, pest control, and resource efficiency, alongside constraints such as digital literacy and infrastructure gaps.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Regenerative & agroecological farming
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Regenerative systems
DOI
10.3390/agronomy15010236
Catalogue ID
SNmov0giof-iik5bv

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.