Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy reportConventional

How can we develop a policy on the responsible use of AI?

Food Ethics Council · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Food Ethics Council opinion piece draws on practitioner workshops to explore how civil society organisations working in food ethics and sustainability might develop responsible AI use policies. Rather than testing interventions or quantifying impacts, the work addresses emerging governance questions about ethical AI adoption in food systems, presenting potential frameworks and implementation considerations.

Regional applicability

Published by the Food Ethics Council, a United Kingdom-based organisation, and likely informed by UK and European practitioner perspectives. The governance frameworks and considerations presented are designed to be relevant to UK and European civil society organisations, though applicability to other food system contexts would depend on institutional and regulatory alignment.

Key measures

Governance frameworks, ethical implementation considerations, policy recommendations (qualitative)

Outcomes reported

The work examines how civil society organisations might develop policies for responsible AI use in food systems. It presents governance considerations and potential frameworks for ethical AI implementation rather than quantifying specific impacts.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy opinion / workshop-based practitioner input
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Food supply chain
Catalogue ID
IR-ESmqgw6kdl-2ea4b7

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.