Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

Microbial inoculation accelerates post-fire soil recovery in a mixed conifer forest

Weiss, E. L.; Banfield, J. F.

bioRxiv · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This study demonstrates that post-fire native soil amendment accelerates recovery of microbial diversity and associated nutrient cycling functions in severely burned mixed conifer forest soils. Although only a subset of introduced microbes successfully colonised the burned soil, inoculation promoted rapid reestablishment of mycorrhizal fungi essential for conifer symbiosis, albeit with limited persistence over a full annual cycle. The findings suggest microbial inoculation could enhance forest reforestation by circumventing reliance on dispersal from distant unburned sites.

Regional applicability

While conducted in a United States mixed conifer forest context, the principles of post-fire microbial inoculation may have limited direct applicability to United Kingdom forestry, which comprises different dominant tree species and fire regimes. However, the methodological approach and findings on mycorrhizal recovery and nutrient cycling restoration could inform UK woodland management research, particularly in regions experiencing increased wildfire risk from climate change.

Key measures

16S and ITS rRNA amplicon sequencing, genome-resolved metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, soil chemistry, bacterial and fungal diversity indices, nitrogen transformation functions, mycorrhizal fungal abundance and composition

Outcomes reported

The study measured changes in bacterial and fungal diversity, mycorrhizal fungal communities, nutrient cycling functions, and soil chemistry in burned forest soil following native microbial inoculation, tracked across six sampling points over an annual hydrological cycle.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial (high-intensity burn pile experiment with sequential and simultaneous sampling)
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Preprint
Geography
United States
System type
Other
DOI
10.64898/2026.06.12.731757
Catalogue ID
IR-ESmqhcvk1h-587a0c

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.