Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewedConventional

Applying Systems Thinking to Sustainable Beef Production Management: Modeling-Based Evidence for Enhancing Ecosystem Services

Luís O Tedeschi; Demian C. Johnson; A.S. Atzori; Karun Kaniyamattam; Hector M Menendez

Systems · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systems thinking analysis of beef cattle production identifies eight interconnected feedback loops that mediate ecosystem service delivery, from soil health and manure management to carbon sequestration and community engagement. The authors argue that improved grazing and manure management practices enhance soil health and vegetation growth, creating positive feedback cycles that benefit both cattle nutrition and economic returns whilst supporting broader sustainability objectives. The framework maps potential contributions to nine UN Sustainable Development Goals and suggests systems thinking reveals ecological–agricultural interactions overlooked by conventional management approaches.

Regional applicability

The systems framework is broadly applicable to UK beef production, where grazing-based and mixed systems predominate. However, the paper does not appear to present UK-specific empirical data, so practitioners would need to contextualise the feedback loops to UK soil types, climate, and regulatory conditions (e.g. environmental stewardship schemes).

Key measures

Feedback loop identification and characterisation; ecosystem service outcomes; alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals; literature analysis of modelling and empirical case studies

Outcomes reported

The study identified eight critical feedback loops in beef production systems and mapped their interconnections to ecosystem services. It demonstrated how systems thinking can reveal hidden interactions between grazing management, soil health, manure management, water use, carbon sequestration, and economic returns.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Grassland & pasture systems
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review with systems modelling framework
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Pasture-based livestock
DOI
10.3390/systems12110446
Catalogue ID
NRmo9zxr64-049

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.